Home Trucker Issues
Trucker Issues
Cars Are Crashing Into Trucks On Purpose For Insurance Money PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 27 March 2013 21:35
There seems to be a whole mess of four-wheeler drivers who are involved in accidents with big rigs because no one ever taught them not to cut off a tractor-trailer traveling at 55mph when they’re only doing 35 from the on-ramp. Their mental prowess definitely leaves something to be desired, but their lack of intelligence doesn’t even come close to matching the brain-dead group of people who have been cutting off commercial trucks to get in accidents on purpose.

You might think that no one could possibly be that stupid, but that’s exactly what over 100 drivers in the Las Vegas area alone have done over the past year. According to a new report issued by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB), they’re doing it to try and cash in on the insurance claims.


Scams like this have been around for a long time, but only recently have they started targeting large trucks. The scam only works if the victim has a good insurance plan which large fleets almost always have. The scammers also like targeting trucks because large companies usually won’t bother challenging the claim where a private citizen might fight the claim and go to court.

This scam is being considered a major problem by the NICB, not just because of the fraudulent insurance claims being paid out, but also because the tactic is incredibly dangerous; not just to the scammer, but to the truck driver and to all of the other cars sharing the road.

The scammers are actually taking it even further in a step that takes the scam from stupid, selfish, and dangerous to downright despicable. They’re filling their cars with unwilling and unknowing passengers. They will often pick up day laborers and tell them that they are driving them to a job site. The workers, who have no idea what’s going on, are there to increase the amount that the scammer can claim in damages from the insurance company. After the accident, they are sent home and the scammer will claim to be filing damages on their behalf, but when the check comes they keep all of the money for themselves.

You can protect yourself from being the victim of scams like these by practicing safe driving habits and following these steps:

  • Install a forward-facing traffic-cam from as high a vantage point as possible. This way it can never be just your word against theirs; it provides irrefutable proof of what actually happened.
  • Take down the name, ID, and contact information for everyone riding in the car, not just the driver. Sometimes a driver will claim there were additional people in the car to increase the payout.
  • Check both the front and back license plates, write them both down and make sure they’re the same.
  • Take pictures of your vehicle, yourself, the other vehicle, and the occupants of the car. Make sure to document exactly what damage was caused by you and what damage was pre-existing.
  • Always call a police officer to the scene, even when there is only minor damage. Having someone there who can file an official report for what damage was caused in the accident will prevent scammers from claiming serious injury or damage later on.
  • Be wary of any medical or legal service providers who contact you about the crash without you reaching out to them first. Some scammers use this tactic to get your personal information.
  • Call the National Insurance Crime Bureau if you suspect a scam at 1-800-835-6422 (24 hours a day, seven days a week). Give license plate number, location of the accident, people involved, why you think this was a fraud, and as many other details as possible.

Source: Truckers Report

 
Don't Blame the Trucker: PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 17 February 2013 07:50
There’s a common misconception that because truckers’ vehicles are so large, they think they can do whatever they want. On the contrary, any good driver knows that the heavier the load, the more careful they have to be. In fact, if you ask most drivers, they’ll tell you that accidents involving a car and truck are most often the car’s fault. Well, now people won’t have to just take your word for it, turns out it’s just been proven to be unequivocally true.

According to a new study published by the American Trucking Association, car drivers were assigned as factors in 81% of crashes involving both a car and a truck while truckers were assigned fault only 27% of the time. The totals add up to more than 100% because in about 10 percent of crashes, blame was assigned to both the car and truck. Even so, that means that a car’s driver is three times more likely to be a contributing factor to a crash than a trucker.


The study was conducted by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and used a sample size of 8,309 car/truck crashes.

Truckers came out on top in almost every single type of accident including same and opposite-direction sideswipes, head-on collisions, and rear-end crashes. The only collisions where truckers were more often found at fault were backing accidents, and they accounted for less than 1% of the crashes used in the sample.

Driver safety may still have a ways yet to go, but when you hold up truckers next to 4-wheelers, I’d say they call us professional drivers for a reason.

 

Source: The Trucker

 

 
How the heck did FMCSA wind up redoing HOS again? PDF Print E-mail

 

 

Ever wonder why the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration seems to keep retooling the hours-of-service regulations?

Well, sit back and kick up your feet. Because it’s a long story and starts back in 1995…

Dec. 29, 1995 – Section 408 of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, directed the Department of Transportation to issue regulations addressing fatigue-related issues (that’s code for hours of service) affecting commercial vehicle safety. The DOT was given a deadline of March 1, 1999, to issue the new HOS regs.

Nov. 27, 2002 – Public Citizen, Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways, Parents Against Tired Truckers and Teamsters for a Democratic Union filed suit compelling the U.S. DOT to issue the rules, which includes new hours-of-service regulations, ordered by Congress. 

April 24, 2003 – The Bush administration announced final rules to allow truckers to drive longer hours but take more time off between shifts under the first hours-of-service changes since 1939.

Dec. 1, 2003 – Public Citizen, Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways and Parents Against Tired Truckers, told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that “far from improving safety, the final rule abandons virtually every principle FMCSA had proclaimed necessary.”

July 16, 2004 – A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit called the new HOS rules “arbitrary and capricious” and threw the regs out.

Sept. 30, 2004 – Congress got in on the act and passed a provision in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2004 that gave FMCSA until Sept. 30, 2005, to reformulate the HOS rules. That allowed FMCSA to keep the April 2003 HOS regs in place during the rulemaking process.

Aug. 19, 2005 – FMCSA unveiled its second attempt to retool HOS since 1939. The 2005 version kept the 34-hour restart, 14 hours of on-duty time and 11 hours of driving from the 2003 rule. However, it revised the spilt sleeper berth provision periods to eight and two hours.

Aug. 29, 2005 – OOIDA filed a petition for reconsideration with the agency. The petition included requests for two “common sense changes.” One request was for the two-hour portion of the split sleeper berth provision to stop the 14-hour on-duty clock. The other request was to allow teams to split the sleeper berth time in something other than the eight- and two-hour periods.

Oct. 1, 2005 – The newly revised hours of service went into effect, despite lingering petitions for reconsideration filed with FMCSA.

Dec. 1, 2005 – In a letter dated Dec. 5, 2005, FMCSA denied OOIDA’s petition for reconsideration.

Jan. 23, 2006 – OOIDA filed a petition for review with the DC Circuit asking the court to review the agency’s changes to the sleeper berth provision, claiming the agency “did not do adequate research to justify the decisions they did make.”

Feb. 27, 2006 – The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the Truckload Carrier’s Association and the Ohio and California Trucking Associations supported OOIDA’s court challenge and filed “motions to intervene” in the petition for review.

Feb. 27, 2006 – A second lawsuit challenging the current regulations was filed by Public Citizen. That case – although challenging the rule very differently – was eventually combined with OOIDA’s suit by the court.

July 24, 2007 – The court tossed the provision that increased driving time to 11 hours from 10 hours and the 34-hour restart provision – on procedural, not safety, grounds. In that same decision, the court denied a petition by OOIDA asking the court to consider the impact of changes to the sleeper-berth provision, thereby removing OOIDA as a plaintiff in the pending litigation.

Sept. 28, 2007 – The DC Circuit denied appeals in the HOS decision and gave the agency until the end of the year to take action on revising the regulations, again.

Dec. 11, 2007 – FMCSA once again retained the current hours-of-service regulation, allowing drivers to use the 34-hour restart and drive the 11th hour, while defending both provisions with additional research.

Jan. 23, 2008 – The DC circuit denied a petition filed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Public Citizen, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, and the Truck Safety Coalition that asked the court to vacate the interim final rule.

Nov. 19, 2008 – FMCSA published “new” final rule in Federal Register, which made no changes to the regulation the industry had operated under since October 2005.

Jan. 19, 2009 – The current hours-of-service regulations officially went into effect.

March 9, 2009 – The third chapter in the HOS saga kicked off when four groups filed a lawsuit asking that the current version of the regulation be tossed. Filing suit were International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Public Citizen, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, and the Truck Safety Coalition.

Oct. 26, 2009 – FMCSA and Public Citizen were granted a joint motion by the court to delay legal action in order to allow FMCSA to craft new HOS regs.

Dec. 23, 2010 – FMCSA rolled out its proposed hours-of-service regulations. For a complete breakdown on the current proposal, check out the February issue of Land Line.

Jan. 27, 2011 – Public Citizen and FMCSA asked the court for “an order continuing to hold proceedings in abeyance pending the issuance of a final rule.” The court agreed ordering the parties to update the court every 60 days beginning March 29 and to file another joint motion 30 days after the final rule is published.

Information contained in this timeline was compiled by Land Line Magazine Senior Editor Jami Jones from OOIDA resources and Land Line Magazine articles.

 
Truck-related traffic fatalities drop 20% PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 22 September 2010 22:20

WASHINGTON  –  The number of truck-involved traffic fatalities declined 20 percent in 2009, dropping from 4,245 in 2008 to 3,380 in 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced Sept. 9.

 

The reduction is the lowest level in recorded Department of Transportation history and also shows a 33 percent decrease in fatalities since........

>>READ MORE<<

 
Times, They Are A Changing - or Repeating - a Good Thing PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tribal   
Tuesday, 02 March 2010 18:40

While sitting in my relaxing chair, at home & looking outside at the crappy weather mother nature has dealt all of us, I came across an article that says exactly what I have been saying for some time. Not that I have any more insight nor farsightedness than anyone else. It will Never be as it was in the old days, but it's going to get better, all the NAYSAYERS over the last few years get ready.

Through all the MAJOR BS that we deal with in day to day operations, it's coming to a head and Fast.  The voices of those of us who have survived this remaining recession and have managed to JUST SAY NO to Cheap Freight, relief is in sight. The article can be found here. Times, They are a Changing from Trucking Info.com. Let's ALL hope it pans out.

Ω

 
«StartPrev12NextEnd»

Page 1 of 2
JoomlaWatch 1.2.12 - Joomla Monitor and Live Stats by Matej Koval
Copyright © 2013 warontruckers.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.