Home Mt. Rose Truck Crash
Mt. Rose Truck Crash
Mt. Rose Truck Crash (continued) PDF Print E-mail
Written by David Jeffers   
Saturday, 28 August 2010 20:25

It has now been over 2 months since the June 18th crash in which a truck driven by Frederick Matthews, 41, of San Diego lost control on Mt. Rose Highway, entered an escape ramp which failed to stop his truck. The truck crashed into a home and burned, killing Matthews and destroying the home.

In an article published by the Sierra Sun on August 20, 2010 there is no timetable for the investigation into the accident. In a quote taken from their article:

Trooper Chuck Allen, public information officer for the Nevada Highway Patrol, said the reason for the delay is an overload in cases pending criminal prosecution that are taking priority over the June 18 incident that killed Frederick Matthews, 41, of San Diego.

“The reason prosecution investigations take priority is that there are pending life-changing issues that come out of those that include lifetime in jail or prison time,” Allen said.

In previous articles on this accident, the Nevada Highway Patrol stated that the investigation on this accident should be completed within 30 days. This delay is suposedly stopping the Nevada DOT from determining whether the escape ramp is safe, even though it has previously failed to stop runaway trucks in the past.

“The accident investigation piece is a key piece to what we need to do,” said Scott Magruder, NDOT public information officer, who added that currently, the ramp remains unchanged from its pre-existing condition.
“It is operational,” Magruder said. “We still feel that it's going to be able to work and function.” 

A quote from a reader at the Sierra Sun:
It's my understanding that this ramp had already had a couple of other failures over the years which include a beer truck and cement or gravel truck.
Mr. Allen states that “the reason prosecution investigations take priority is that there are pending life-changing issues that come out of those that include lifetime in jail or prison time."
I would suggest to Mr. Allen and Mr. Magruder that the failure of the ramp constituted a "life-ending issue" to Frederick Matthews, 41, of San Diego and that it may very well constitute a "life-changing issue" to the next driver who expects that ramp to perform to specification.
Jeers to the State of Nevada for not taking care of this known public safety issue.

 

There is NO reason that NDOT is failing to address the failure of the escape ramp on Mt. Rose Highway. It has failed more than once. Why do they need to wait for the Nevada Highway Patrol to investigate this accident before they act? Who else must die before the people in charge of the safety on the highways get off their duffs and FIX IT!

If it had been fixed after the previous runaway truck ran through the ramp designed to STOP it, maybe Frederick Matthews, 41, of San Diego would still be ALIVE!

 

***NEW UPDATES***

Sierra Sun Article (9-21-2010)

 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 06 October 2010 22:39
 
Mount Rose Truck Crash PDF Print E-mail
Written by David Jeffers   
Tuesday, 22 June 2010 18:15

 

A truck driver hauling lumber was killed after his truck apparently lost it's brakes on Mount Rose Highway near Incline Village Nevada on June 18, 2010. The driver used the gravel escape ramp designed precisely for this kind of emergency. The escape ramp however did not stop the truck, in fact the truck careened through the escape ramp and crashed into a home located beyond the far end of the escape ramp and burst into flames. Fire department personnel were unable to reach the driver and he died in the fire. Fortunately the one person in the home escaped uninjured.

This is not the first time this particular escape ramp has failed to stop a runaway truck, in fact there have been 3 prior incidents in the past 9 years where trucks using this escape ramp have been launched off the far end. Scott Magruder, spokesman for the Nevada Department of Transportation was quoted in an article by the Nevada Appeal -  “... We're confident this ramp will do its job to stop a truck”.

On Monday, Magruder said NDOT officials will evaluate the ramp to determine if it needs safety improvements; he said the department is waiting for a complete incident report before making any decisions because it should describe the weight and load of the vehicle, as well as what angle it hit the ramp.

When asked what possible improvements NDOT may consider, Magruder said the department will most likely lean toward the most cost-effective strategy, although he said nothing has been ruled out.

 

What is wrong with this?

Runaway ramps are suppose to stop a fast moving truck!

Let me repeat that:

RUNAWAY RAMPS ARE SUPPOSE TO STOP A FAST MOVING TRUCK!

If you think about it, most runaway trucks are fast movers, this is why runaway ramps are placed on long downgrades, to PREVENT a major accident in case of brake failure, mechanical malfunction or driver error. This accident should never have happened! Yes obviously something went wrong either with the driver or the truck, but the runaway ramp should have stopped the truck and not allowed it to pass through. Mr. Magruder says that NDOT is confident that the runaway ramp will do it's job? Obviously IT HAS NOT! Four trucks crashing through the end of the ramp is clear evidence of that. The statement by Magruder that "NDOT officials will evaluate the ramp to determine if it needs safety improvements" This sounds like lip service with little or no action intended. NDOT will use the most "COST-EFFECTIVE STRATEGY" sounds to me like safety isn't their highest concern.

Semi-trucks aren't the only large vehicles on the road anymore. Diesel Pusher Motor Homes which are built on large bus chassis are very heavy also and have the same type air-brakes that heavy trucks use. Will it take one of these large vehicles using this same escape ramp, possibly killing an entire family while on vacation to finally get the necessary safety improvements that are so desperately needed. Cynical as this sounds, unfortunately it takes a major loss of life before those in government take action.

To Scott Magruder and the NDOT officials: Take action NOW before anyone else loses their life. Safety should be your first concern, not cost-effectiveness. Start now not later. No matter what the results are from the accident investigation, the run-away ramp has failed to do what it was designed to do and it needs fixed NOW. That is YOUR duty and YOUR responsibility.


http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/article/20100624/NEWS/100629954

http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20100624/NEWS/100629865

http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20100621/NEWS/100629979/1070&ParentProfile=1058

http://www.mynews4.com/story.php?id=20492

http://www.mynews4.com/story.php?id=20830&n=122

http://www.rgj.com/article/20100622/NEWS/6220354/Three-other-trucks-had-crashed-through-the-Incline-truck-ramp

 Ω

 

 


JoomlaWatch 1.2.12 - Joomla Monitor and Live Stats by Matej Koval
Copyright © 2013 warontruckers.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.